NOTE 1.–Before parting with Chinghiz let me point out what has not to my
knowledge been suggested before, that the name of ‘_Cambuscan_ bold’ in
Chaucer”s tale is only a corruption of the name of Chinghiz. The name of
the conqueror appears in Fr. Ricold as _Camiuscan_, from which the
transition to Cambuscan presents no difficulty. _Camius_ was, I suppose, a
clerical corruption out of _Canjus_ or _Cianjus_. In the chronicle of St.
Antonino, however, we have him called ‘_Chinghiscan rectius_ Tamgius
_Cam_’ (XIX. c. . If this is not merely the usual blunder of _t_ for
_c_, it presents a curious analogy to the form _Tankiz Khn_ always used
by Ibn Batuta. I do not know the origin of the latter, unless it was
suggested by _tankis_ (Ar.) ‘Turning upside down.’ (See _Pereg. Quat._, p.
119; _I. B._ III. 22, etc.)

social class trends and smoking 1950 2005
clean and clear and under control australia
new car power adapter for dell latitude 110l laptop
botanique aromatherapy candles
when the soil has reached an organic matter equilibrium
funny way to share animated digital pictures
clean and clear oil free moisturizer
concrete finish patio
find information about costa rica
custom video packaging